, Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply, See case mapped in Subject Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide, See discussion and analysis of the case on IAReporter, Decision on Bifurcation (March 2013) (not public, see IAReporter story), Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Charles N. Brower. The PV Investors v. Spain, PCA Case No. Of the final awards issued, the State has won a handful, including the first decision involving solar incentives in Europe (Charanne BV and anor v The Kingdom of Spain - SCC Case No. The Transnational Dispute Management Journal (TDM, ISSN 1875-4120) and OGEMID listserv focus on recent developments in the area of (investment) arbitration and dispute management, regulation, treaties, judicial and arbitral cases, voluntary guidelines, tax and contracting. The Energy Charter Treaty (1994) Nationality of the parties. You can find all TDM IACL Case Reports here. The PV Investors v. Spain The PV Investors v. Spain (PCA Case No. T The first case lodged against Spain was in 2011 by PV Investors. The PV Investors v. Spain, PCA Case No. Fill in the registration form and answer a few simple questions to receive a quote. ARB/13/30). 2012-14. This paper presents the current energy scenario en Spain, and the outlooks for different renewable options, with special focus on photovoltaic (PV) solar energy. (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o), Ad hoc cases under the UNCITRAL Rules: PV Investors v. Spain (registed November 2011); Natland Investment Group NV, Natland Group Limited, G.I.H.G. The PV Investors v. The Kingdom of Spain (PCA Case No. Helios’ portfolio includes more than 600 MW of income-generating energy projects in sectors such as Solar PV, Wind, Biogas, Energy from Waste, which are located in Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Poland, and the UK. ga('create', 'UA-68964108-1', 'auto'); First Line of Reasoning – All State Measures Frustrated Legitimate Expectations. The Tribunal upheld the Alternative Claim and found that Spain violated the ECT by not providing the Claimants with the "reasonable rate of return" as promised under the regulatory framework in place when the Claimants made their investments. The underlying dispute arose out of the evolution of the legal framework applicable to the FET, legitimate expectations, immutability of the legal framework, reasonable rate of return, The PV Investors v. The Kingdom of Spain (PCA Case No. The PV Investors v. Kingdom of Spain: Final Award, 28 February 2020 Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Charles N Brower, 28 February 2020: PCA Case No. Charles N. Brower, Arbitrator v. Spain, ICSID Case No. New to ISLG? 2012-14) - Final Award and Concurring and Dissenting opinion of Charles N. Brower - 28 February 2020, Case report provided by International Arbitration Case Law (IACL). PCA Case No. 3. AES Solar and others (PV Investors) v. Spain, Decision on Bifurcation, 1 Mar 2013 AES Solar and others (PV Investors) v. v. Spain. //-->
